With the 'Current' and 'Worst' numbers, higher is always better, and they are. Now cystaldiskinfo no longer shows the 'caution current pending sector count' message. Instead, they are intended to indicate 'how good' or 'how bad' that metric's value is on a scale. are normalized qualitative values, that is they don't indicate the actual number of sectors, etc. Since you cant get it replaced, id just use it but knowing that every important data you save on it has to be backed up very soon because its probably not as reliable as before. The 'Current', 'Worst', and 'Threshold' values reported by S.M.A.R.T. So the point here is that your HD now is at risk, could work fine for years without any problem if you're lucky, could happen what happened to me and work for a while, or could just have a total failure right away.
Crystaldiskinfo current pending sector count Pc#
It was the HD on one of my backup pcs (always on tho) and I can tell you that it kept working for over 2 years after that, in which the number of sectors kept gettin higher, until one day the pc rebooted itself and would still work but windows would take half an hour to start because the drive had a lot of problems. Count of unstable sectors (waiting to be remapped. Well, what does the reallocated sector mean Now, let me explain it to you. attribute, which indicates the count of reallocated sectors on your hard drive. From experience, I've had something like that happen to me before, a drive that started with a pending sector, then got fixed, then after some time it got worse again and the number was higher. If an unstable sector is subsequently read successfully, the sector is remapped and this value is decreased. 1 Hello, first of all sorry for my bad English. Reallocated sector count is a critical S.M.A.R.T. No one can give you a clear answer because ALL drives in the end will fail, its not a matter of IF, but a matter of WHEN. The pending sector count has not increased, which is a good sign, and the other SMART statistics seem healthy enough in my opinion.
0 kommentar(er)
